1. I was really impressed with how spot on Brian Ascher is in this article about what it takes to create a disruptive financial service company. It really resonated with me and got me thinking about a few things I hadn’t before, mostly around the relationship between big data and network effects, or as Brian calls it “big data learning loops”. It almost feels like we need a new term for this concept as it pertains to financial services specifically.

    Since I’m working on a new company in the life insurance space, I’ve been thinking about how this concept might apply. Obviously underwriting is a process entirely driven by data and it will likely change dramatically as insurers get better at analyzing the data and quickly feeding it back in to their underwriting practices, in as close to real time as possible. But the systems challenge is far less interesting than the question of how new kinds of data such as social media, the social graph, identity authentication, and more might be used in underwriting.  And of course, there could be plenty of legal and privacy questions brought up by such practices. For the insurer that figures this out, a huge competitive edge is sure to exist. But then again, I’m not holding my breath.

     
  2. There are lots of charts and numbers in this infographic take about how insurers are using social media.  But so little of this information can be extrapolated to how the activity is impacting the actual business of the insurers. What I find most interesting is the content breakdown. So much time on social media is spent talking about Corporate Social Responsibility it makes me wonder if the time would be better spent building actual trust in their product and purchase experience, rather than things that are tangential.

    There are lots of charts and numbers in this infographic take about how insurers are using social media.  But so little of this information can be extrapolated to how the activity is impacting the actual business of the insurers. What I find most interesting is the content breakdown. So much time on social media is spent talking about Corporate Social Responsibility it makes me wonder if the time would be better spent building actual trust in their product and purchase experience, rather than things that are tangential.

     
  3. image: Download

    These  1960s illustrations about money are incredible.  I want to build a financial brand inspired by this look. Seriously. (via How People Earn and Use Money: Vibrant Vintage Illustrations from 1968 | Brain Pickings)

    These  1960s illustrations about money are incredible.  I want to build a financial brand inspired by this look. Seriously. (via How People Earn and Use Money: Vibrant Vintage Illustrations from 1968 | Brain Pickings)

     
  4. GreenDot’s GoBank launched its mobile only bank with a ‘pay whatever you want’ revenue model yesterday.  I’ve long thought GreenDot is one of the most interesting financial service companies out there. While I don’t think that actually being a bank (as opposed to just a front end like Simple.com) actually makes an ounce of difference to the customer, the long-term strategic advantage that this provides GoBank can be huge since it will let them steer their ship independently and ultimately will open up new opportunities for revenue and relationship building. Definitely something to watch.

    GreenDot’s GoBank launched its mobile only bank with a ‘pay whatever you want’ revenue model yesterday.  I’ve long thought GreenDot is one of the most interesting financial service companies out there. While I don’t think that actually being a bank (as opposed to just a front end like Simple.com) actually makes an ounce of difference to the customer, the long-term strategic advantage that this provides GoBank can be huge since it will let them steer their ship independently and ultimately will open up new opportunities for revenue and relationship building. Definitely something to watch.

     
  5. Sure you hate your bank. But will you switch?

    Nice piece on the NYT home page today for Simple.com. They quickly zero in on this main question:  Can Simple get people to switch their banking relationships?  Nobody likes their bank, but getting off your behind and doing something about it seems like a risk.

    While I certainly agree that this is the main hurdle from a customer perspective, I also think switching isn’t as scary as they make it out to be. Younger people’s financial relationships aren’t all that complicated to begin with and re-doing your bill pay list seems like a small price to pay for a bank you might actually like. After all, you deal with them on a daily basis. Plus, trying out the Simple.com service before moving your entire relationship there is quite easy.

    The more interesting question to me seems to be in Simple’s business model. Can they really make enough money just off the interest rate spread (especially in a near zero interest environment) and off interchange fees that have been capped by Dodd Frank?  It doesn’t feel like enough. But if they take the long term view and build a business model off a profitable relationship rather than a profitable product, well that would be the most disruptive thing of all.

     
  6. Where are the fin svcs deals on this list?

    Some interesting data in the AngelList valuation browser that lets you look at done deals they’ve been tracking since 2010. Some quick takeaways:

    1. Financial services isn’t even one of the filter options among the 35 markets/industries they break out. Where is all the innovation here?

    2. Y Combinator grads have valuations that are way higher than grads of any other program. One could argue that they find the best companies and add the most value to them. Of course the flip side to the argument would be that it’s all just marketing hype. Over time the exit numbers will tell which story is right.

    3. My grad school alma mater (Wharton) makes the list but has lots of catching up to do in number of deals relative to some of the bigger schools. My sense is this will change as Wall Street continues to be an unattractive option for these grads. 

     
  7. 11:17

    Notes: 68

    Reblogged from explore-blog

    Tags: workish

    It’s nice to see good design associated with a financial brand. Too bad it’s from 1930.  Still, some great inspiration here for my latest venture.

    Got this from: explore-blog:

    Gorgeous vintage covers of Fortune magazine from the 1930s-1950s.

     
  8. image: Download

    Happy 2nd Birthday Oren. Don’t know where you got it but you’ve got style already.

    Happy 2nd Birthday Oren. Don’t know where you got it but you’ve got style already.

     
  9. image

    How did we end up with a fiscal cliff deal that doesn’t actually solve any substantive economic problems? Wasn’t that the whole point of creating the fiscal cliff in the first place?   This chart tells the story pretty well. 

     
  10. 17:42 23rd Dec 2012

    Notes: 619

    Reblogged from jtotheizzoe

    Tags: playish

    image: Download

    While I love this visualization because I think its clean and well designed, I do think it brings up many issues when dealing with trying to represent data fairly. Its not clear why these animals were chosen or how representative they are of the entire range of possible lifespans. We are left with the choice of either trusting the source or distrusting it, which is really counter to the point of clear data presentation. 

    While I love this visualization because I think its clean and well designed, I do think it brings up many issues when dealing with trying to represent data fairly. Its not clear why these animals were chosen or how representative they are of the entire range of possible lifespans. We are left with the choice of either trusting the source or distrusting it, which is really counter to the point of clear data presentation.